Re: High Avaliable in the PostgreSQL. - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: High Avaliable in the PostgreSQL.
Date
Msg-id 20070530211833.GA17639@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to High Avaliable in the PostgreSQL.  (Fernando Ike de Oliveira <fike@midstorm.org>)
Responses Re: High Avaliable in the PostgreSQL.  (Adam Tauno Williams <adamtaunowilliams@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-admin
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:42:08PM -0300, Fernando Ike de Oliveira wrote:
> was 99,7% but considering the current necessities, change percentual
> to 99,99%. I think in solution probability  pgpool-2 or Heartbeat +
> GFS. The PostgreSQL servers will be in different physical places.

I would be very interested to see a set-up that can actually
guarantee 99.99% uptime across a wide area link.  What write speeds
do you need in the database?  What is your tolerance for loss of
committed data?

A
--
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
"The year's penultimate month" is not in truth a good way of saying
November.
        --H.W. Fowler

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: "Roman Chervotkin"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump: Error message from server: ERROR: compressed data is corrupt
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump: Error message from server: ERROR: compressed data is corrupt