* Alvaro Herrera (alvherre@commandprompt.com) wrote:
> Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Yeah, I wouldn't want one per second.
>
> It's not one per second, it's after one second (actually
> deadlock_timeout) has elapsed since you started to sleep waiting for a
> lock. If a deadlock is not detected the process won't be awakened
> again.
Ah, I see.. Actually, if it's just one NOTICE after one second, I think
that'd be fine. Sorry, misunderstood what was going on.
Thanks!
Stephen
