Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, let's be clear: this is entirely the fault of the inet type not
> accepting what we now know to be RFC-compliant address specifications.
> So we ought to put fixing that on the TODO list. It's not happening
> for 8.3 though, let alone in existing release branches, so we'd best
> put in a workaround until it's there.
Already added to TODO.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
