On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 11:20:52AM +1000, Nick Urbanik wrote:
> Dear Alvaro,
>
> On 15/05/07 21:12 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >Nick Urbanik wrote:
> >>On 15/05/07 18:53 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >>>Instead of waiting a month for the time when you can take the
> >>>application offline (thus accumulating a month's worth of dead tuples),
> >>>run a non-full vacuum more often (say, once a day or more). It doesn't
> >>>lock the table so the app can continue to be online while it runs.
> >>
> >>Yes, it is vacuumed non-full regularly. However, for some reason,
> >>only a full vacuum will recover the space.
> >
> >You probably need to better configure the FSM settings. See
> >fsm_max_pages in the docs.
>
> This is probably the critical piece of information we need to prevent
> the need for another sleepless night and an outage! Thank you.
http://www.pervasive-postgres.com/instantkb13/article.aspx?id=10087&cNode=5K1C3W
might be of use as well.
--
Jim Nasby decibel@decibel.org
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
