If people want proof that we have had some patches for months, this email is from Simon from January, 2007. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Simon Riggs wrote: > On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 19:04 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > I will start processing the patches held for 8.3 this week or next, now > > that the holiday break is over: > > > > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold > > > > The following patches don't appear on this list: > > Concurrent psql > Original submission > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-08/msg00249.php > Latest > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-12/msg00527.php > Described here: http://community.enterprisedb.com/concurrent/index.html > > WAL Index Split > Original submission > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-12/msg00045.php > Latest > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-01/msg00000.php > > Grouped Items > Latest > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-11/msg00051.php > Described here: http://community.enterprisedb.com/git/index.html > > Maintain Cluster Order > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-08/msg00124.php > > All have been awaiting review for at least a month (though in one case > the latest version is quite recent). They probably ought to be on the > hold queue; all are ready to be reviewed for final > application/rejection. > > I'd hasten to add that none of those are mine. My patches have received > good attention, so I'm not complaining just completing admin. > > -- > Simon Riggs > EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
pgsql-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных
