Jim Nasby wrote:
> On Apr 12, 2007, at 7:54 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> > Two questions: Why is pg_backend_pid documented with the stats
> > functions (9.19 System Information Functions) seems more logical.
> >
> > Also, I can see mentioning the stats functions in the monitoring
> > section, but shouldn't they actually be documented in with the rest
> > of the functions?
>
> No comments? Does that mean if I write up a patch it'll be accepted?
Yea, I was wondering about that. I think the best idea would be to
reference the backend functions from the main functions page, rather
than move them.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +