Re: plperl vs. bytea - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: plperl vs. bytea
Date
Msg-id 200705061517.46632.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: plperl vs. bytea  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: plperl vs. bytea  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> It's not. If we really want to tackle this root and branch without
> upsetting legacy code, I think we'd need to have a way of marking
> data items as binary in the grammar, e.g.
>
>   create function myfunc(myarg binary bytea) returns binary bytea
> language plperl as $$ ...$$;

This ought to be a property of data type plus language, not a property 
of a function.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Teach tuplesort.c about "top N" sorting, in which only the first
Next
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Teach tuplesort.c about "top N" sorting, in which only the first