Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Preliminary GSSAPI Patches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Preliminary GSSAPI Patches
Date
Msg-id 200705011502.30844.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Preliminary GSSAPI Patches  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Preliminary GSSAPI Patches  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom, Josh, Magnus.

> I can't speak to the situation on Windows either; if OpenSSL isn't
> commonly used on Windows that may be a sufficient reason for supporting
> GSSAPI too.  I'm just unconvinced by any argument that suggests we'll
> replace our SSL support with it.

I can't imagine we will either.  I think we should offer users choices, 
within reason.  

> IIRC we had a gnutls patch offered, but rejected.

Darn, this happened while I was offline.  I would have supported it.  I 
still think it's a good idea, pending patch quality.

> > Also, last I checked OpenSSL didn't ship with Windows and Kerberos
> > encryption did.
>
> How long ago did you check? I've been using OpenSSL on windows for many
> years. Actually, it was supported just fine on Windows back when it was
> added to PostgreSQL *at least*.

I didn't say *available for download*, I said *ship with*.  That is, does a 
Windows Vista Pro box from the factory come with OpenSSL on it?  It does 
come with Microsoft SSPI, although I don't know compatibility issues.

-- 
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Where to find kind code for STATISTIC_KIND GEOMETRY?
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: temporal variants of generate_series()