Simon Riggs wrote:
> > That should go away entirely; to me the main point of the separate
> > wal-writer process is to take over responsibility for not letting too
> > many dirty wal buffers accumulate.
>
> Yes
>
>
> I'll make the agreed changes by next Wed/Thurs.
I have seen no patch yet with the agreed changes.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
