Gregory Stark wrote:
>
> "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
>
> > The threads to updatable views have concluded rejecting the patches, and
> > with ideas that require rather extensive rewriting of the rule manager,
>
> I have some ideas on a different approach to this if anyone's thinking of
> starting fresh
What ideas?
> but I had the impression that the patches were rejected because
> they were unnecessarily complex, not because the overall approach was
> rejected.
Well, there was the unneeded complexity as one argument, but the "with
check option" stuff needed a big rework as well.
http://groups.google.es/group/pgsql.hackers/browse_thread/thread/ed69543ea417a2f/d0b628881ead1e05
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
