[ psqlodbc-Bugs-1003103 ] copy_and_convert_field(...) destroys bind info for wide char varchar columns - Mailing list pgsql-odbc
From | |
---|---|
Subject | [ psqlodbc-Bugs-1003103 ] copy_and_convert_field(...) destroys bind info for wide char varchar columns |
Date | |
Msg-id | 20070419071300.A3EB62173DB@pgfoundry.org Whole thread Raw |
List | pgsql-odbc |
Bugs item #1003103, was opened at 2007-04-15 16:39 You can respond by visiting: http://pgfoundry.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=538&aid=1003103&group_id=1000125 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Thomas Zehbe (thomasz) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: copy_and_convert_field(...) destroys bind info for wide char varchar columns Initial Comment: I'm using psqlodbc 08.02.0200 on SuSE Linux 9.3, Postgres 8.0.1 with libiodbc 3.52.5 and wxWidgets. psqlodbcs config params are: ./configure --enable-pthreads --enable-unicode --with-iodbc CFLAGS="-ggdb -O0 The problem occured is that for varchar colums an insert is possible up to the max length, but an update only up to the countof characters of the value wich was last read. F. E. a colum containg "12345" can't be updated to "12345aaa". It's always cut to "12345". I found that ResolveOneParam(...) sets "used" to the number of last readed chars, instead of SQL_NTS (in fact "-3"). So onupdate only this number of chars is converted. At the end of copy_and_convert_field I Found this statement: if (pcbValue) *((SQLLEN *) pcbValueBindRow) = len; During the first read *pcbValue is "-3" for SQL_NTS columns, but the assignment sets it to the count of chars read. I changed it to if (pcbValue) if (*pcbValue >= 0) *((SQLLEN *) pcbValueBindRow) = len; so SQL_NTS is retained in *pcbValue. Now update works Regards, Thomas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Thomas Zehbe (thomasz) Date: 2007-04-19 09:13 Message: Many thanks for your hint! I put your information immediately on the wxList and will explore the problem myself, too. Maybe it'll take some time as I'm a bit under pressure actually. I'll report the results. Thanks again and regards, Thomas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hiroshi Inoue (hinoue) Date: 2007-04-19 04:30 Message: AFAIC it's not the problem of psqlodbc driver. I found a similar report at http://lists.wxwidgets.org/archive/wx-users/msg20409.html . Hmm it was more than 4 years ago. Was it solved ? regards, Hiroshi Inoue ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thomas Zehbe (thomasz) Date: 2007-04-18 12:24 Message: Sorry for racting late. But I didn't get an email notifier. Seems that I have to take a look. I'n not sure what you mean with ODBC API sequences. So let me give a first try. I attach a file with an code example. The lines which provide the buffer on a per column base look like that: SetColDefs (idx++, wxT("prodbezeichnung"), DB_DATA_TYPE_VARCHAR, b.prodbezeichnung, SQL_C_WXCHAR, sizeof(b.prodbezeichnung),FALSE,TRUE); It is the wxWidget interface defined as wxDbTable::SetColDefs(). I provide only a single buffer for every column. I believe that wxWidgets handles the param buffers. It must be the case when I use a where clause typed as a string. In wxDbTable::Open() wxWidgets first (indirectly) calls PGAPI_BindParameter for every column wich should be read and afterwords for every column wich should be updatable. In my apps typically all coulumns are readable, but not all are updatebale (primary key and all columns in a view wich don't belong to the 'main' tabkle are not updatetable. Hope this gives a first hint what happens. Thanks and regards Thomas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hiroshi Inoue (hinoue) Date: 2007-04-17 01:43 Message: Hmm don't use the same buffers for both columns and parameters ? If so, please treat them carefully. regards, Hiroshi Inoue ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hiroshi Inoue (hinoue) Date: 2007-04-16 06:04 Message: Could you tell me the ODBC API sequences in your app ? regards, Hiroshi Inoue ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://pgfoundry.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=538&aid=1003103&group_id=1000125
pgsql-odbc by date: