Re: Vista/IPv6 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Vista/IPv6
Date
Msg-id 20070411180450.GB7401@svr2.hagander.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Vista/IPv6  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Vista/IPv6  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 02:03:11PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >Am Mittwoch, 11. April 2007 17:06 schrieb Andrew Dunstan:
> >  
> >>There is a configure time and a runtime check. The code is below - note
> >>the first #ifdef.
> >>    
> >
> >Yeah, the problem is that the msvc build has no intelligence to detect the 
> >IPv6 APIs to define HAVE_IPV6.  So that needs to be developed.
> >
> >  
> 
> The configure test just looks for a definition of struct sockaddr_in6. 
> Taking a quick look It seems to me like this is unconditionally there in 
> the MSVC WS2tcpip.h , so maybe we should just force it for MSVC.

That was my question. I just built with ipv6 enabled using my msvc build on
my primary machine which does *not* have ipv6, and it still passes
regression tests fine.

Given that we have a runtime check, is there any reason at all not to
enable ipv6 on all builds on msvc?

(FWIW, it's been in the platform SDK at least since Windows 2000)

//Magnus



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Vista/IPv6
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Vista/IPv6