Re: Beginner Question - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Jan de Visser
Subject Re: Beginner Question
Date
Msg-id 200704090751.53347.jdevisser@digitalfairway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Beginner Question  ("s d" <s.d.sauron@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Monday 09 April 2007 05:09:53 s d wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to figure out how to debug a performance problem / use psql
> explain. The table in question is:
> # \d word_association;
>            Table "public.word_association"
>  Column |          Type          |     Modifiers
> --------+------------------------+--------------------
>  word1  | character varying(128) | not null
>  word2  | character varying(128) | not null
>  count  | integer                | not null default 0
> Indexes:
>     "word1_word2_comb_unique" unique, btree (word1, word2)
>     "word1_hash_index" hash (word1)
>     "word2_hash_index" hash (word2)
>     "word_association_count_index" btree (count)
>     "word_association_index1_1" btree (word1)
>     "word_association_index2_1" btree (word2)
>
> It has multiple indices since i wanted to see which one the planner choses.
>
>
> # explain select * FROM word_association WHERE (word1 = 'bdss' OR
> word2 = 'bdss')  AND count >= 10;
>                                            QUERY PLAN
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>--------------------- Bitmap Heap Scan on word_association
> (cost=11.53..1192.09 rows=155 width=22) Recheck Cond: (((word1)::text =
> 'bdss'::text) OR ((word2)::text = 'bdss'::text))
>    Filter: (count >= 10)
>    ->  BitmapOr  (cost=11.53..11.53 rows=364 width=0)
>          ->  Bitmap Index Scan on word_association_index1_1
> (cost=0.00..5.79 rows=190 width=0)
>                Index Cond: ((word1)::text = 'bdss'::text)
>          ->  Bitmap Index Scan on word_association_index2_1
> (cost=0.00..5.67 rows=174 width=0)
>                Index Cond: ((word2)::text = 'bdss'::text)
> (8 rows)
>
> The questions:
> 1. i can undestand where the cost=11.53 came from but where did the
> 1192.09 come form? The values are in milli right ?
> 2. the query takes  in reality much longer than 1 second.
>
> In short, it feels like something is very wrong here (i tried vacuum
> analyze and it didn't do much diff).
> any ideas ?

You need an index on (word1, word2, count). In your current setup it will have
to scan all rows that satisfy word1 and word2 to see if count >= 10.

jan


--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Jan de Visser                     jdevisser@digitalfairway.com

                Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-menu!
--------------------------------------------------------------

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Michael Dengler"
Date:
Subject: Re: Do I need to rebuild php-pgsql for 8.2.3
Next
From: Steve
Date:
Subject: Question about memory allocations