Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?
Date
Msg-id 200704071129.38320.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?  (Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Folks,

> > I'll see what I can do on the NetBSD and Solaris fronts.
>
> IMO, the Solaris one is probably more important than NetBSD.

Solaris is taken care of ... should be online in a week or two.  Sun DBTG Q.A. 
set up in the Sun labs:

Solaris 9 + Sparc + SunCC
Solaris 8 + Sparc + SunCC
Solaris 10 + Sparc + SunCC
Solaris 10 + x86 + SunCC
Solaris 10 + x86 + gcc
Solaris Nevada + Sparc + SunCC
Solaris Nevada + x86 + SunCC
Solaris Nevada + x86 + gcc

... which ought to cover most of the platforms we're interested in from 
Solaris.  The 8 and 9 machines will just build current, but the 10 and Nevada 
machines will build CVS, 8.1, 8.2 and rotationally older versions (once each 
week).  We're building in as many options as we have support for, including 
perl, kerberos (on Nevada), Dtrace (on 8.2) and integer-datetimes.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Pavan Deolasee"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Optimized pgbench for 8.3
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Fate of pgsnmpd