Re: Auto Partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: Auto Partitioning
Date
Msg-id 20070404164328.GA13030@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Auto Partitioning  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Auto Partitioning  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 10:07:39AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> >My hope is to have a mechanism to partition indexes or recognise
> >that they are partitioned, so that a set of provably-distinct
> >unique indexes can provide the exact same functionlity as a single
> >large unique index, just without the management nightmare.
> 
> Will this address the fairly common data design problem where we
> need to ensure that a given value is unique across several tables
> (possibly siblings, possibly not)?

That would be where the provably-distinct part comes in, so yes.

> If so, then full steam ahead.

Cheers,
D
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778        AIM: dfetter666                             Skype: davidfetter

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to PostgreSQL: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Markus Schiltknecht
Date:
Subject: Re: Auto Partitioning
Next
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code?