Re: Blocked post - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Blocked post
Date
Msg-id 200704021933.l32JXIr01326@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Blocked post  (Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: Blocked post
List pgsql-patches
Dave Page wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Simon Riggs wrote:
> >> I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice
> >> now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm
> >> not sure what the problem is?
> >>
> >> Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00
> >> Sent:  1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00
> >
> > What an obvious ploy to get more time for development.  ;-)
>
> In a bid to stave off such accusations, Simon had a couple of us witness
> the outgoing mail in his Sent Items folder. We can arrange for copies of
> our notarized statements to be provided if necessary :-p

Well, FAST posted emails dated April 4 a few days ago, proving email
dates are not a valid method of authenticating the "sent" date.  Perhaps
FAST's post-dated emails were meant to throw us off of Simon's pre-dating
them.  ;-)

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>          http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                               http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Current enums patch
Next
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: Blocked post