Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > What are *you* thinking? Yes, that patch has that line, but
> > log_statement and log_min_duration_statement is going to trigger
> > log_min_error_statement so you are going to get the statement printed
> > twice.
>
> What's wrong with that? If a statement triggers two different log
> entries, and both are subject to being annotated with the statement text
> according to log_min_error_statement, I would expect them both to be
> annotated. Doing otherwise will probably break automated log analysis
> tools.
Are people going to be happy that log_statement and
log_min_duration_statement output the statement twice?
test=> SHOW log_min_error_statement;
log_min_error_statement
-------------------------
error
(1 row)
test=> SET log_statement = 'all';
SET
test=> SELECT 1;
?column?
----------
1
(1 row)
Server log has:
LOG: statement: SELECT 1;
STATEMENT: SELECT 1;
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
