Post this time to the list, the last time I sent it to Kris directly, sorry
for that
Hi Kris
I think that your patch could be better if instead of using the "signed" right
shift operator (>>) followed by a bit mask, use directly the "unsigned" right
shift operator (>>>)
So
((val >> 24) & 0xFF)
would better as
val >>> 24
By the way great work folks
Nelson Arapé
A happy Postgres JDBC user in his first time post to the list
PS: Sorry for my english, not my native language
El Martes, 27 de Febrero de 2007 04:21, Kris Jurka escribió:
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Kris Jurka wrote:
> > I've created the attached test which tests the original code (Orig), your
> > code (Two), and my suggestion of an int4buf (Three) and got the following
> > surprising results:
>
> Based on that test and a similar attached test for reading, I'm prepared
> to apply the attached patch. Let me know what you think.
>
> Kris Jurka
