Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > wondered why that proposal had been overlooked, so I started a separate
> > > thread to ensure that the idea was discussed. That seems very similar to
> > > many of your own posts.
> >
> > True, but usually I don't see the breakage.
>
> Sorry, I just meant you summarise ideas that others have made, not that
> your proposals are broken.
My proposals are often broken.
> > What concerned me is you
> > saw some of the breakage, but still went ahead with the proposal.
>
> I have never and will never propose something I know to be broken. That
> shouldn't need to be said, but I've had to say that more than once
> recently for some reason. Why would you even think that the author of
> PITR would harbour some hidden disrespect for server integrity, or
> somebody who overhauled the standards compliance documentation, with
> Troels, has no respect for standards?
I was merely trying to focus us on making sure we stay on track. I know
you share the same goals.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
