Re: [BUGS] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [BUGS] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
Date
Msg-id 200702261521.l1QFLNm21346@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-patches
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> > There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any
> > comments.
>
> The actual answer to the question "Can I compile PostgreSQL with
> Kerberos v5 support?" is "Yes, why not?".  I don't think "Can I use
> this weird internal private library that seems to provide a similar
> interface?" is a "Frequently Asked Question".

I don't use Solaris so I don't know if it is frequent issue or not.
I assume the author knows.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>          http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                               http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: NikhilS
Date:
Subject: Re: Recalculating OldestXmin in a long-running vacuum
Next
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: 1-byte packed varlena headers