On Saturday 24 February 2007 23:11, Tom Lane wrote:
> I also tend to think that a conversion will be easier in a year or two
> than it is today --- the problems noted upthread are certainly a
> heads-up that cvs2svn is not yet as robust as one could wish.
Cvs2svn seems to make as much sense of CVS data as possible. The only real
problem I have seen is with regard to the malformed files I mentioned
earlier. I haven't seen any other concrete examples. Could someone fix the
previously mentioned files in the CVS respository to be valid? After fixing
those files, I get no messages during import except that some commit comments
appear to be in some encoding other than ascii. I am in the middle of
checking commits involving those files to make sure they make sense.
wt
--
Warren Turkal (w00t)
