Gregory Stark wrote:
> You're still merging patches and reviewing patches by hand, without any of the
> tools to, for example, view incremental changes in the branch, view the logs
> of the branch, merge the branch into the code automatically taking into
> account the known common ancestor. Instead of receiving a 20k patch without
> any tools to work with it you would be given a branch name and be able to view
> and merge it into the main branch using the tools.
I don't see this as a win. I understand the ability to see the patch as
separate revisions by the user, but for patch application, we really
need to see the diff -c of the entire patch.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
