Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 200701292248.l0TMmUR29395@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > I am pretty amazed people are considering shortening the release cycle
> > for our most popular platform.
>
> Are you volunteering to back-port and test all the Windows fixes that
> never went into 8.0?
>
> I think we should either do that, or admit that we're not supporting
> 8.0.x on Windows.  I favor the latter; I'm certainly unwilling to spend
> any of my own time on the former.

I am fine with abandoning Win32 8.0.X because we don't want to backport
(like we did with 7.2.X), but not because we don't want to build the
install binaries.

--
  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Crazy Error
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 9.0