Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was
Date
Msg-id 200701281406.l0SE6FV02047@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> This patch has broken much of the buildfarm.
>
> > I think it is because I didn't have #include <signal.h> in exec.c.  Added.
>
> Doesn't seem to have helped ...

It did for some, and using the built-in macro fixed the rest.

--
  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was terminated by signal