Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was
Date
Msg-id 200701280233.l0S2XWn04496@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> >> Good idea.  I only have sys_siglist[] on BSD/OS, and Linux and FreeBSD
> >> have that too, so I only used that.  We will now print both signal
> >> descriptions and numbers for backend error exits, and descriptions only
> >> for pclose() because we only have a three-argument function to log.
> >> Attached and applied.
>
> This patch has broken much of the buildfarm.

I think it is because I didn't have #include <signal.h> in exec.c.  Added.

--
  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: uuid patch 3.0 (8.3devel)