Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 200701271505.l0RF5XC21382@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches  (Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim@CommandPrompt.com>)
Responses Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL  (Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>)
List pgsql-general
Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 08:41 +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> >
> > What do people think about that? Does anyone think it would be an
> > unreasonable policy?
>
> I don't think so. You should build 8.0 binaries until the community
> stops maintaining PostgreSQL 8.0.
>
> This is what we do for RPMs -- I know it is really a lot of work to
> maintain older releases but as a community packager, it is not my "job"
> to force people to upgrade to new version by not supplying older
> binaries.

Agreed, and I do believe we should be supporting releases as far back as
reasonably possible.

--
  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Stats collector frozen?
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches