Re: guid/uuid datatype - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: guid/uuid datatype
Date
Msg-id 20070120121545.GM26080@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: guid/uuid datatype  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: guid/uuid datatype
List pgsql-patches
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Gevik Babakhani wrote:
> >> I'd be willing to accept a core uuid type sans generator function,
> >> but is that really all that useful?
> >>
> >  This is also a point I remember from the last discussions. To not to
> > include the generator in the core. The generation of the uuid is then
> > going to be on the client side.
> >
> > The uuid type is very useful, especially when migrating from other
> > systems to pg  (ms->pg or syb->pg).
>
> But does it really help if you don't have the generator?

We could have all the type code in core, and the generator in contrib or
pgfoundry.  That way the user can choose the most appropriate generator,
even if it's platform-specific.  Or he can choose to use a client-side
generator.

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Gevik Babakhani
Date:
Subject: Re: guid/uuid datatype
Next
From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Date:
Subject: Re: guid/uuid datatype