Re: datatype advice numeric vs. varchar - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Martijn van Oosterhout
Subject Re: datatype advice numeric vs. varchar
Date
Msg-id 20070118061921.GB29963@svana.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to datatype advice numeric vs. varchar  (Gene <genekhart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: datatype advice numeric vs. varchar
List pgsql-general
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 01:15:02AM -0500, Gene wrote:
> I'm working on a voicemail application which involves storing phone
> numbers and other types that have long sequences of digits [0-9]. I
> need to be able to do pattern matching using LIKE and map the fields
> back to java String objects. I was thinking maybe it would be more
> efficient to use the numeric(x,0) type instead of a varchar since it
> could use less space on disk.

Your calculations are reasonable, but if you do it as numeric you're
going to be fighting the system the whole way. Numerics are treated as
numbers and things like LIKE don't work on them. When you select them,
java is likely to convert them to numbers there too.

Is this not a case of premature optimisation?

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: FATAL: invalid frontend message type 47 server closed the connection unexpectedly
Next
From: Michael Glaesemann
Date:
Subject: Re: datatype advice numeric vs. varchar