Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp major release 8.3.0, - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp major release 8.3.0,
Date
Msg-id 20070111121556.GB29614@svr2.hagander.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp major release 8.3.0,  (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp major release 8.3.0,  (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>)
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp major release 8.3.0,  (Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 10:49:59AM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 09:51:11AM +0100, Joachim Wieland wrote:
> > There are, see for example
> > ecpg/test/expected/compat_informix-dec_test-MinGW32.stdout
> > 
> > AFAIK there were no other platforms except for MinGW that need special
> > treatment.
> 
> Talking about MinGW, do all MinGW systems return:
> 
> Connection refused (0x0000274D/10061)
> 
> if the connection is refused, or do the numbers differ?

It shuold be the same - 10061 is the win32 error code. 274D is just the
hex version of the same one.

> Or in other words, do we need the sed call in pg_regress.sh or could we
> do this with a arch specific expected file too?

Can't comment on that one, since I just noticed it existed. How similar
was this one to the "standard regression tests"? Those were moved into a
C executable so they'd run on a Windows system without a shell, could
the same be done relatively easilyi with this one?

(Obviously we can't run the ecpg regression tests on msvc builds now -
oops, didn't know those had their own script)

//Magnus


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Simon Riggs"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] wal_checksum = on (default) | off
Next
From: "Simon Riggs"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] table partioning performance