Re: installcheck vs regression DLLs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: installcheck vs regression DLLs
Date
Msg-id 20070111075212.5ED12DCC143@svr2.hagander.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: installcheck vs regression DLLs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > what really is the motivation for keeping some of the tested binaries in the sourcetree when doing installcheck?
> 
> As opposed to what?  We're certainly not going to *install* regress.so,
> and I can't see requiring contrib to be there either.  These are test
> files, not part of the installation-under-test.

That would've been my suggestion since I'd say they're both. But if that's not happening and nobody has a better idea,
thenworkaround it is. I'll try to make 
 
it as non-ugly as I can. 

/Magnus



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Meskes
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp major release 8.3.0,
Next
From: Joachim Wieland
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp major release 8.3.0,