Josh Berkus wrote:
> All,
>
> Hey, is there any good reason why FSM is sized by a static GUC variable?
> Why couldn't we just automatically have the system use as much memory as
> it needs for FSM, provided that it's not more than some reasonable limit,
> like 15% of shared memory?
>
> Seems like that would eliminate one area of user confusion, as well as
> over-allocation.
I don't think any of our shared memory segments auto-size. What would
you take memory from to increase FSM?
-- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
