Dave Page wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Right, because even the decision of whether they should be in the queue
> > is a decision for us. The hold queue additions are less stringent than
> > the main patch queue.
>
> Isn't that always the case though, not just after FF when the hold queue
> starts getting activity again? That would imply the need to a permanent
> triage(?) queue, and a version specific one imho.
The hold queue is not used during normal development. I don't see value
in a triage queue.
-- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
