Re: Add PGDLLEXPORT to PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Add PGDLLEXPORT to PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1
Date
Msg-id 2007.1478300835@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add PGDLLEXPORT to PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1  (Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>)
Responses Re: Add PGDLLEXPORT to PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at> writes:
>> Anyway, I have prepared a patch along the lines you suggest.

Pushed, we'll see if the buildfarm likes this iteration any better.

> It occurred to me that the documentation still suggests that you should
> add a declaration to a C function; I have fixed that too.

I didn't like that and rewrote it a bit.  It's not specific to V1
functions.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Doug Doole
Date:
Subject: Re: Improving executor performance
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: btree_gin and btree_gist for enums