Re: [PATCHES] Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and
Date
Msg-id 200612271428.kBRESPQ16911@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> > The current terminology of live and dead is already used in many places in the
> > documentation and in userspace; mostly around the need for maintainance of
> > dead tuples within tables, reindex cleaning up dead pages, and even in the
> > vacuum commands output (n dead tuples cannot be removed yet). Given this
> > patch came from userland, istm people are comfortable enough with this
> > terminology there is no need to change it.
>
> +1

OK.  I will adjust any places that still use expired, and put the patch
into the queue.

--
  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: mark@mark.mielke.cc
Date:
Subject: Re: Bitmap index thoughts
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Bitmap index thoughts