Re: effective_cache_size vs units - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From tomas@tuxteam.de
Subject Re: effective_cache_size vs units
Date
Msg-id 20061227094558.GC15370@www.trapp.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: effective_cache_size vs units  (Benny Amorsen <benny+usenet@amorsen.dk>)
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 09:39:22AM +0100, Benny Amorsen wrote:
> >>>>> "TL" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> 
> TL> Anyone against making it case-insensitive, speak now or hold your
> TL> peace.
> 
> SI-units are inherently case-sensitive [...]

As a notorious lurker, set my weight to one mg (choose the case ;-)

I'd tend to keep case sensitivity, but will hold my peace regardless of
outcome.

Thanks
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFkkDWBcgs9XrR2kYRAmKFAJwPMOwl+IbCbMQvszn9RKpXRW3N6ACfbwne
juGsqnMsj2BMyCO+BjP9hq4=
=KCiY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jie Zhang"
Date:
Subject: Re: Bitmap index thoughts
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Bitmap index thoughts