Re: [PATCHES] Load distributed checkpoint patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From ITAGAKI Takahiro
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Load distributed checkpoint patch
Date
Msg-id 20061222113657.6425.ITAGAKI.TAKAHIRO@oss.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Load distributed checkpoint patch  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote:

> > I consider that smoothing the load (more meaningfully, response time)
> > has higher priority over checkpoint punctuality in a practical sense,
>  
> I agree with that.

I agree with checkpoint_time is not so important, but we should
respect checkpoint_segements, or else new WAL files would be
created unboundedly, as Bruce pointed.

Regards,
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: column ordering, was Re: [PATCHES] Enums patch v2
Next
From: Christopher Browne
Date:
Subject: Re: Stats Collector Oddity