Re: Bad iostat numbers - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Michael Stone
Subject Re: Bad iostat numbers
Date
Msg-id 20061205121507.GZ1622@mathom.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bad iostat numbers  ("Alex Turner" <armtuk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Bad iostat numbers
List pgsql-performance
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 01:21:38AM -0500, Alex Turner wrote:
>My other and most important point is that I can't find any solid
>recommendations for a SCSI card that can perform optimally in Linux or
>*BSD.  Off by a factor of 3x is pretty sad IMHO. (and yes, we know the
>Adaptec cards suck worse, that doesn't bring us to a _good_ card).

This gets back to my point about terminology. As a SCSI HBA the Adaptec
is decent: I can sustain about 300MB/s off a single channel of the
39320A using an external RAID controller. As a RAID controller I can't
even imagine using the Adaptec; I'm fairly certain they put that
"functionality" on there just so they could charge more for the card. It
may be that there's not much market for on-board SCSI RAID controllers;
between SATA on the low end and SAS & FC on the high end, there isn't a
whole lotta space left for SCSI. I definitely don't think much
R&D is going into SCSI controllers any more, compared to other solutions
like SATA or SAS RAID (the 39320 hasn't change in at least 3 years,
IIRC). Anyway, since the Adaptec part is a decent SCSI controller and a
lousy RAID controller, have you tried just using software RAID?

Mike Stone

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Mark Lonsdale"
Date:
Subject: Re: Configuration settings for 32GB RAM server
Next
From: "Alex Turner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Bad iostat numbers