Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> >On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 11:05:34AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>Actually I don't buy this argument. The only major change in
> >
> >Ok, good. So why isn't Postgres-R something we have _now_?
>
> That's is a good question and as I mentioned, I don't know much about
> Postgres-R. My point was directly to the argument that a fast moving
> PostgreSQL somehow limits the ability for replication to be built. That
> argument, I believe is false.
>
> I originally responded to the rest of your email but thought better of
> it. The only thing I can say is, my experience is that something like
> replication will only be productively completed, outside the community.
This is like nVidia saying that "open source developers are not
competent enough to understand the coding of a graphics card driver".
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
