Re: RC1 blocker issues - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: RC1 blocker issues
Date
Msg-id 20061124203721.GC4318@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RC1 blocker issues  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: RC1 blocker issues  ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 02:48:22PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > * possible rearrangement of pg_stat column order:
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-11/msg00643.php
> > Should we do this, and if so should we force initdb (via a
> > catversion change)?  I'm currently leaning to the thought that if
> > we change it we should force initdb, else we'll risk having a
> > noticeable user-visible difference between different "8.2"
> > installations.
> 
> Actually, on looking closer, we *must* force initdb because this
> changes the expected output for the rules regression test.
> 
> So, yea or nay?  I'm working up the patch right now, but will hold
> off applying until I hear some comments.

+1 on applying it.  Beta testers should understand what "beta" and
"test" mean. :)

Cheers,
D
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778        AIM: dfetter666                             Skype: davidfetter

Remember to vote!


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [CORE] RC1 blocker issues
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [CORE] RC1 blocker issues