Re: Shutting down a warm standby database in 8.2beta3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Harris
Subject Re: Shutting down a warm standby database in 8.2beta3
Date
Msg-id 20061123181806.GA1625@pugwash.spuddy.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Shutting down a warm standby database in 8.2beta3  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Shutting down a warm standby database in 8.2beta3  (Stephen Harris <lists@spuddy.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 03:03:03PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Stephen Harris <lists@spuddy.org> writes:
> > We can see that the sleep process got it!
> >   /export/home/swharris/rr[37]: 29537 Quit(coredump)
> > And my script detects the trigger file
> >   Wed Nov 22 13:43:51 EST 2006: End of recovery trigger file found
> 
> > Now database recovery appears to continue as normal; the postgres
> > recovery processes are still running, despite having received SIGQUIT
> 
> Well, sure, because system() will have ignored the SIGQUIT.  You have to
> make the shell script return an abort code rather than exit(1) or
> whatever it's doing in this case.  (I've tested that CVS HEAD does the

Hmm, on Linux I did a kill -QUIT on the process group and then rather
than cleanly exiting my recovery script I "kill -9"d it.  The database
still completed recovery as previously described.  

> right thing when the script is just a straight invocation of cp.  But
> if the script is trapping errors, it's going to have to cooperate.)

The script doesn't trap errors; ksh itself plays with SIGQUIT.

I guess I should rewrite my script in perl and see what happens.

-- 

rgds
Stephen


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.2 open items list
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.2 open items list