Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Wasn't there supposed to be some discussion among replication authors to
> try to come up with at least some common hooks?
>
> If everybody invents their own grammar, GUC vars, etc. etc. it will be
> impossible to handle down the track. We'd be faced with a choice of
> never having any replication in core, or picking one and leaving the
> others out in the cold. This is supposed to be a *community*.
I don't have the expectation that Mammoth Replicator will ever be
open-sourced (this is my personal opinion; the company owner may
differ). And even if it were, I doubt it would serve as a basis for
whatever community effort to build a replication engine. I don't think
it's in anybody's best interest to base design decisions on Mammoth
Replicator "experience". The projects that are already open source are
in a much better standing for that (GORDA, Postgres-R, Slony, etc).
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
