Re: PostgreSQL underestimates sorting - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Frank Wiles
Subject Re: PostgreSQL underestimates sorting
Date
Msg-id 20061122105341.79874069.frank@wiles.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL underestimates sorting  (Markus Schaber <schabi@logix-tt.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:28:12 +0100
Markus Schaber <schabi@logix-tt.com> wrote:

> Hi, Steinar,
>
> Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:17:23AM +0100, Markus Schaber wrote:
> >> The Backend allocates gigs of memory (we've set sort_mem to 1
> >> gig), and then starts spilling out more Gigs of temporary data to
> >> the disk.
> >
> > How much RAM is in the server? Remember that sort_mem is _per
> > sort_, so if you have multiple sorts, it might allocate several
> > multiples of the amount you set up.
>
> That one machine has 16 Gigs of ram, and about 10 Gigs tend to be
> "free" / part of the Linux blocklayer cache.
>
> The temporary data is not swapping, it's the Postgres on-disk sort
> algorithm.

   Are you actually running a query where you have a GB of data
   you need to sort?  If not I fear you may be causing the system
   to swap by setting it this high.

 ---------------------------------
   Frank Wiles <frank@wiles.org>
   http://www.wiles.org
 ---------------------------------


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: availability of SATA vendors
Next
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: availability of SATA vendors