Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
> Matt Miller wrote:
> > Yeah, and I don't expect that they'll be a rush to commit this to
> > head anytime soon. I'll be happy enough tracking this locally. I
> > think it's a win for my situation.
>
> Why should we add this Oraclism to PostgreSQL? I doesn't add any new
> feature.
Certainly, this feature falls well within the class of completely
gratuitous proprietary extensions that we typically reject.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
