On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 08:17:09PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> mark@mark.mielke.cc writes:
> > On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 11:01:40AM -0500, Neil Conway wrote:
> >> Presumably those are just the standard warnings we can't easiy
> >> eliminate. If not, can you post them please?
> > They all appear harmless.
> The reason those "uninitialized variable" warnings got away from us is
> that gcc doesn't emit them at -O2 or below, so most of us never saw 'em
> before. I've cleaned them up.
Cool. Thanks. I like my compiles warnings free. :-)
> The "find_rule" gripe is really a flex bug :-( ... not easy to avoid.
*nod*
Cheers,
mark
--
mark@mielke.cc / markm@ncf.ca / markm@nortel.com __________________________
. . _ ._ . . .__ . . ._. .__ . . . .__ | Neighbourhood Coder
|\/| |_| |_| |/ |_ |\/| | |_ | |/ |_ |
| | | | | \ | \ |__ . | | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__ | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all and in the darkness
bindthem...
http://mark.mielke.cc/