Re: [PATCHES] smartvacuum() instead of autovacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: [PATCHES] smartvacuum() instead of autovacuum
Date
Msg-id 20061023183628.GR26892@nasby.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] smartvacuum() instead of autovacuum  ("Hitoshi Harada" <hitoshi_harada@forcia.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] smartvacuum() instead of autovacuum  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: [PATCHES] smartvacuum() instead of autovacuum  ("Hitoshi Harada" <hitoshi_harada@forcia.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
If the decision to vacuum based on autovacuum criteria is good enough
for you then I think you should just focus on getting autovac to do what
you want it to do. Perhaps you just need to decrease the sleep time to a
few seconds, so that autovac will quickly detect when something needs to
be vacuumed.

The only case I can think of where autovac might not work as well as
smartvacuum would be if you had a lot of databases in the cluster, since
autovacuum will only vacuum one database at a time.

On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 11:18:39AM +0900, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
> Ok, 
> 
> But my point is, autovacuum may corrupt with vacuum analyze command
> on another session. My intention of smartvacuum() is based on this.
> Any solution for this??
> 
> Regards, 
> 
> 
> Hitoshi Harada
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 11:10 AM
> > To: Hitoshi Harada
> > Cc: 'Peter Eisentraut'; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] smartvacuum() instead of autovacuum
> > 
> > "Hitoshi Harada" <hitoshi_harada@forcia.com> writes:
> > >> How is this different from what autovacuum does?
> > 
> > > My application needs to do vacuum by itself, while
> > > autovacuum does it as daemon.
> > > The database is updated so frequently that
> > > normal vacuum costs too much and tables to be updated are
> > > not so many as the whole database is vacuumed.
> > > I want to use autovacuum except the feature of daemon,
> > > but want to control when to vacuum and which table to vacuum.
> > > So, nothing is different between autovacuum and smartvacuum(),
> > > but former is daemon and later is user function.
> > 
> > This seems completely unconvincing.  What are you going to do that
> > couldn't be done by autovacuum?
> > 
> >             regards, tom lane
> > 
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
> 

-- 
Jim Nasby                                            jim@nasby.net
EnterpriseDB      http://enterprisedb.com      512.569.9461 (cell)


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "luis garcia"
Date:
Subject: Problems starting Template1...
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: New CRC algorithm: Slicing by 8