Re: adminpack and pg_catalog - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: adminpack and pg_catalog
Date
Msg-id 200610210001.47121.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: adminpack and pg_catalog  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Friday 20 October 2006 21:03, Neil Conway wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 22:59 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Nothing except initdb should add objects in pg_catalog.  AFAICS,
> > adminpack doesn't have any special requirements, so it should behave
> > like all other contrib modules.
>
> Okay. Are there any opinions on whether we should make this change to
> contrib/adminpack now (i.e. during the 8.2 beta), later (for 8.3), or
> not all at?
>

Not saying we should or shouldn't, but if we are going to do it, istm we ought 
to do it now while we are still in beta.  Is there a backwards compatability 
issue for older systems? (Not that this doesn't get worse if we release yet 
another release with it)

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Theo Schlossnagle
Date:
Subject: Re: xlogdump fixups and WAL log question.
Next
From: Krycek
Date:
Subject: Re: Granting all tables in schema by one SQL command