Re: [HACKERS] Bug? - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Bug?
Date
Msg-id 20061018184346.GG85041@nasby.net
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Bug?  ("Indira Muthuswamy" <indumuthu@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-sql
Moving to -sql.

On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 06:53:46PM +0530, Indira Muthuswamy wrote:
> Hai,
> 
> I have encountered a problem with PostgreSQL.I have created a table
> 'tab1' with a column 'a' with serial type.I entered 20 records into the
> table.So the query
>  select max(a) from tab1;
> returned 20.When I tried the same query after the command
> truncate table tab1;
> I found that the output of the first query as
> 
> max
> -----
> 
> (1 row)
> When I tried to insert a new row into the table tab1 I found that the
> value at column a incremented to the value 21.
> But I heard from my friends that the value of the serial column gets
> decremented whenever we issue the 'truncate table' command (in MS SQL
> SERVER).Is the concept same with PostgreSQL or not?Can anyone clarify me on
> this?

Your friends are mistaken. TRUNCATE does nothing to affect sequences.
-- 
Jim Nasby                                            jim@nasby.net
EnterpriseDB      http://enterprisedb.com      512.569.9461 (cell)


pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: "Andy"
Date:
Subject: plpgsql record as parameter ???
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: hi i want help on levels