On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 11:39:20AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
> > It would be handy for things like pgpool and Continuent, which
> > could reliably distinguish up front the difference between a
> > transaction that can write and one that can safely be sliced up
> > and dispatched to read-only databases.
>
> Yes, I think that would be the use case. I wish someone were to
> implement that.
I think you meant "would" rather than "were to." ;)
I've brought it up with the pgpool people :)
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666
Skype: davidfetter
Remember to vote!
