Re: [PERFORM] Hints proposal - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: [PERFORM] Hints proposal
Date
Msg-id 200610131557.24420.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PERFORM] Hints proposal  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>)
Responses Re: [PERFORM] Hints proposal  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jim,

> Well, that's not what I said (my point being that until the planner and
> stats are perfect you need a way to over-ride them)... but I've also
> never said hints would be faster or easier than stats modification (I
> said I hope they would).

Yes, you did.  Repeatedly.  On this and other threads, you've made the
statement at least three times that per-query hints are the only way to go
for 8.3.   Your insistence on this view has been so strident that if I
didn't know you better, I would assume some kind of hidden agenda.

Stop harping on the "per-query hints are the true way and the only way", or
prepare to have people start simply ignoring you.

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Andrew Dunstan"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] index advisor
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Hints proposal