Re: PostgreSQL vs. SQL Server, Oracle - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: PostgreSQL vs. SQL Server, Oracle
Date
Msg-id 200610112255.33818.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL vs. SQL Server, Oracle  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL vs. SQL Server, Oracle  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>)
List pgsql-advocacy
David,

> Then they should have mentioned it.  PostgreSQL has real issues, and
> if they'd mentioned any one of these, it would have been reasonable.
> Instead, these guys chose to spread the FUD around and call PostgreSQL
> a toy.

That's not how I read the article.  They recommended PostgreSQL for "edge"
applications, which is the conventional opinion on Open Source databases.
From my perspective, it's a positive article for us: "Try PostgreSQL, you
might like it."

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. SQL Server, Oracle
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. SQL Server, Oracle